Pierre Hadot was thinking of an adequate word for philosophy as an exercises of our psyche. He chose the phrase:
Who argued that, when talking about virtues, we have only fragments of Hellenistic philosophers and try to understand it, but we kind of fail, just like monks in the book "A Canticle for Leibowitz"?
„any coherent and complex form of socially established cooperative human activity through which goods internal to that form of activity are realized in the course of trying to achieve those standards of excellence which are appropriate to, and partially definitive of, that form of activity, with the result that human powers to achieve excellence, and human conceptions of the ends and goods involved, are systematically extended” (MacIntyre, 2008, p. 187) is a definition of:
When talking about Byron's understanding of virtue, a person that doesn't know how to act properly in given situation is:
The so- called umbrella term for: -intrinsic motivation and pursuing goals that are congruent with one’s core interests and values -vitality or calm, energetic feelings -taking part in activities that make people feel alive, engaged, and fulfilled would be:
In Waterman's research (1993) on "two meanings of happiness" the correlation between eudaimonia and hedonic enjoyment was:
Who came up with an idea of felicific calculus, that can be applied by everybody, taking only quantity of pleasures into account:
about 40-50 % of the current Subjective well-being's variance between people is connected with genetic differences
Seligman and Peterson after analyzing the dominant spiritual and philosophical traditions originating in different locations found many similarities. They distinguished 6 core virtues: courage, justice, humanity, temperance, transcendence and:
“What must be done, simply is done" (unconsciously), refers (most accurately) to which stage of becoming an expert?
